New world war

THE NEW WORLD WAR

SUMMARY

Look at the next video: It contains some sound advices!

Since September 11, 2001, the Free world is at war. The enemy is not only terrorism. Islamism is the enemy. It is new fascist ideology based on hate for freedom and sponsered by the Arab dictatorships.

Indeed, Islamism is not only seeking to influence one religion or control one region: Islamism is waging war against all the civilizations and not only against the “Jews and Crusaders”.

According to this core analysis:

-Firstly, we have to neutralize the terrorist network implemented in the democracies, and to overthrow the dictatorships which are the sponsors of this plague.

-Secondly, we must underline that the ultimate solution to Islamism relies on the extend of democracy to the Arab world .

-Thirdly, we need a moral and psychological rearmament in order to fight the flow of disinformation's. We have to promote education in order to eradicate obscurantism and negative beliefs.

Clearly, it is sure that we shall win the war on terrorism. It is not sure that we shall succeed in implementing democracy. In this case, a containment policy should be appropriate.

1-ISLAMISM 2-THE BATTLEFIELD 3-MORAL REARMAMENT 4-ALTERNATIVE

1-ISLAMISM: DEFINITION

The Free world is at war. Many scholars, notably in Europe, claim that the world is only facing with a new wave of terrorism. In fact, the word “Terrorism” does not depict the threat. Of course, "Terrorism" applies to the attacks on New york, Bali, Mombassa, Moscow, Madrid and London but we are not only facing with few terrorist groups. They are supported by an ideology, Islamism, which is more and more expanding among the muslim world. What is more, this ideology is clearly backed up by some specific States. It means that the enemy is not only terrorism. Islamism is the enemy.

11-Islamism

We need a precise definition of Islamism.

1-It's a reactionary movement. Islamism hates modernity, capitalism, human rights, democracy, science and knowledge. It emphasizes on the following feelings: The idea that the Arab World is a permanent victim, the hate of freedom and Democracy, the will to promote violence as a mean to solve any problem, and finally Anti Semitism.

In a recent past, we have known this speech. It is quite the same that those of the Nazis. In short, some areas of the Arab World are contaminated by a primary fascism, just like the people of Germany fifty years ago.

2-It's a fundamentalism because it refers to the islamic law (The sharia'a) and the early Islam represented by the Umma of Muhammad. Obviously, sharia'a is opposed to human rights, democracy, freedom, and emancipation of women. Sharia'a recommends mutilation and stoning. That has nothing to do with any civilized way of life.

3-It's a war project: Its main motto is: International islamic front for the jihad against the jews and crusaders". It means that Islamism and terrorism are closely connected. Islamism is the political channel and terrorism the military channel of the same plague. Of course, some islamists maintain that they condemn terrorism but in the mosque, radical imams deliver hatred speeches, recruit young people and send them to the battlefield.

4-It's a project supported by the Arab dictatorships. With the end of the cold war, these dictatorships found themselves deprived of any support. In such a situation, dictators feared to lost their power. In order to stop the extend of democracy, they launched or supported Islamism. Clearly, they are the real sponsors of the movement.

As a result, Islamism is expanding on the fast lane: The more visible islamic criteria is the hijab. Few years ago, it was only worn by old women or by women living in Iran and Saudi Arabia. Today, everywhere in the world, most of muslim women, even very young girls, wear the hijab. Indeed, Islamism is not only seeking to influence one religion or control one region: It aspires to unlimited and universal power and challenges the liberal world order in a global battle over the future course of the human odyssey.

12-Islamism and Islam

Islamism refers to Islam and there are some connections that we must explain.

Despite some propaganda, the historical Islam does not appear like a peaceful religion. Its main book the Koran contains many sourates calling for violence. As this point seems ignored or falsified, just check by yourself: Click on www.hti.umich.edu. Then click on "text collections", then on "koran", then on "brownse the koran" and finally on "the cow". Then go to sourate 2.191. It's just an example.

The founder of the religion, Muhammad was a conqueror. He engaged himself many battles and did not hesitate to kill his prisoners. After his death, the jihad war conquest lasted for over 1000 years and in Mediterranean sea the piracy only ended with the colonization of North Africa.

In conquering countries, Christians and Jews endured a specific status: The Dhimmitude. It included prohibition of churches bells, of new religious buildings and a Tax. Today, most of the muslims Arab countries prohibit any christian or jew proselytism. In fact most of the former jews and christian communities have been obliged to leave these countries soon after the independence (Except in Iraq and Syria).

Consequently, many scholars may argue that Islamism is just a koranically correct expression of Islam.

13-Clash of civilization

Many Europeans scholars contend that waging war against Islamism could lead to a clash of civilizations opposing Christians to Muslims. In fact, Islamism cannot merit to be ranked as a civilizations since it is just a barbarous ideology. It does not not only attack the Jews and the Christians. It also threaten Buddhist and Hindu civilizations (Recently a Buddhist monk was beheaded by the islamists in South Thailand. Obviously, this poor monk was not a Jew, nor a Crusader!).

It means that Islamism is waging war against all the civilizations and not only against the “Jews and Crusaders”. However, many Europeans try to disconnect terrorism from Islamism in order to please to some radical muslim groups in Europe. They also want to disconnect terrorism from the Arab dictatorships which remain a large market for an influent business lobby.

1-ISLAMISM 2-THE BATTLEFIELD 3-MORAL REARMAMENT 4-ALTERNATIVE

2-THE BATTLEFIELD

Terrorism is just one dimension of this new war. In short, there are three battlefields: The terrorist network, the low intensity intifada and finally the dictatorships.

21-The terrorist network

Terrorism is not new. For many years, some terrorist strikes have been organized by the secret services of States: They assassinated some leaders, hijacked some planes and so on. However, the new terrorism brings three major innovations.

Firstly, it focuses on mass murder. With biological, chemical, or radiological weapons, the terrorist cells can kill ten or hundred thousand people in one shot. (What is more, we have not yet experienced the worst: The viral Kamikaze. He inoculates himself with a dreadful virus, travels by plane, infects all the passengers with the virus and on turn the passengers contaminate at home other people and so on!)

Secondly, the terrorists do not come from foreign countries. The terrorist cells are close to your home and not ten thousand miles overseas! It just like a fifth column implemented in your neighborhood. Moreover, the terrorists are not isolated. They rely on active supporters or on people who indulge for them. This support appears to be larger than we thought before, because many individuals seem to have been influenced by the Islamist propaganda.

Thirdly, each terrorist cells seems autonomous and destroys itself in action: When the crime has been committed, you realize that the Kamikaze actors are dead as we have seen with the attacks against the twin towers and the Pentagon.

Some scholars correctly conclude that in such a situation, governments should take into account nationality, ethnicity, and religious affiliation in their homeland security policies and engage in what they call "Threat profiling." These steps may hurt the human right activists but they are less harmful than to "being incinerated at your office desk by a flaming hijacked plane".

22-The low intensity intifada

Terrorism is not the only war tool. Intifada, the so called "insecurity" in our Central Europe, is in fact the second tool used by the Islamists.

In Palestine, Hamas and Hezbollah are recruiting the kids, boys and girls, in order to develop a perpetual urban guerilla: Intifada. They also form the tank where the kamikazes come from. From the arab world, this plague is right now expanding in Central Europe and disturbs the civil peace inside many European countries. It's not called intifada but "insecurity" attributed to some young people.

Democracy has the duty to protect itself and its citizens. Consequently, the solutions must be based on Tolerance zero and a large involvement in re-education. The fight of this low intensity Intifada cannot only imply the police. We certainly need a civil and decentralized guard just like in Switzerland. What is more the muslim leaders have a large responsibility. According to their teaching and speeches, this low intifada could slow down or expand. Presently, it expands!

23-the dictatorships

Clearly, the terrorists cells are receiving support from their real sponsors. It means that we cannot expect the eradication of the cells as long as the dictators will remain in charge.

The islamic plague began in Saudi Arabia. Wahhabism and the Saudi family implemented a fanatical society inclined to backwardness. In the seventies, with the oil crisis, they expanded Islamism all over the Muslim world from Morocco and West Africa to Indonesia. They used oil money to corrupt and implement Islamic regimes or Islamic opposition in an increasing number of countries. Since the beginning, they finance terrorism and provide it with leaders (Bin Laden). Such a situation cannot be accepted. Of course, we know that this country possess the largest oil fields in the world. The actual question is: How can we separate the oil money and the Islamism?

The second Islamic tank is Iran. The Shah was engaging his country towards modernization through a constant struggle against obscurantism. Despite this fact, we gave facilities to Khomeini and he took over Iran. We know the result: alltheway to the seventh century! On the other hand, Iran is not Saudi Arabia. Iran was a civilized area before the fall of the Shah and a powerful educated middle class still exists among the population.

We must underline that the ultimate solution to Islamism relies on the extend of democracy to the Arab world (Go to the greater Middle East).

1-ISLAMISM 2-THE BATTLEFIELD 3-MORAL REARMAMENT 4-ALTERNATIVE

3-MORAL REARMAMENT

The Islamists and their allies constantly try to weaken our determination. We really need a moral and psychological rearmament in order to fight the flow of disinformation's.

31-Fight disinformation

Since the September attacks, the leftists in all our western countries are trying to weaken our determination through a strategy of culpability.

Thank to the media, they currently teach that we have killed the indians, developed slavery, looted all the wealth of the third world. We have been accomplice of the nazi. We are currently racist and so on. Such a speech is daily propagated by the media and some intellectuals who indulge for Islamism.

We must say that it's too much. We must develop a real counter-offensive against this large disinformation. Clearly, we need many Free World Academies!

32-Adapt the juridical framework

There is actually a constant debate about the laws to apply to the terrorists. We have to distinguish war laws and civil laws.

War laws and notably Martial laws have ever existed and been recognized by the civilized world: War is not a matter of justice ( When you kill a soldier, you do not intend to punish him. You only prevent him to make some expected actions). Obviously, the war against terrorism implies war laws: We have to neutralize suspected people before they act (With civil law, you apprehend a person when she has committed a crime. In our case, there is nobody to apprehend because the kamikazes kill themselves. Moreover, when the crime turns out in mass murder, it's a little consolation to apprehend the guilty because the worst has already happened!).

Some lawyers in Europe say that democracy has to set an example of the human rights. We may object to such recommendations in just recalling two facts: Firstly, at the beginning of the war against Japan, the President Roosevelt arrested and interned all the people belonging to the American-Japanese community in order to prevent a fifth column. Of course, it was not exactly consonant with the human rights! Secondly, during the battle of Ardennes, Dwight Eisenhower court-martialled hundred illegal german soldiers who had stolen battle-dress from american soldiers in order to infiltrate and disorganize the US lines.

So you have just to ask the following question to the European protestors " Do you really think that the President Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower were big offenders against the human rights? If you think so, just remember that without these men, you should be yet under the nazi rule!"

33-Promote education: The global learning concept

There is no doubt that in the long term the strengthening of democracy will depend on the progress in education. Of course, the dictators find their main support among the illiterates and that is why they strongly boost obscurantism or fundamentalism.

Once again, education is the key for our future. It's the only way for avoiding a clash of civilizations. That is the goal of the global learning system.

1-ISLAMISM 2-THE BATTLEFIELD 3-MORAL REARMAMENT 4-ALTERNATIVE

4-THE ALTERNATIVE: CONTAINMENT

Clearly, it is sure that we shall win the war on terrorism. It is not sure that we shall succeed in implementing democracy.

So we must think about an alternative solution based one containment. Firstly, an immaterial curtain should separate the free world from the dictatorships: No trade, no migrations, no visits. Secondly, the rioters and the Islamists should be expelled of the entire free world.

41-The immaterial curtain

Most of people and rulers in the Middle East think that we are addicted to their oil. In fact, oil is abundant and it explains why oil prices are constantly decreasing on the long run. This abundance also explains why technical progress are delayed: Hydrogen motor and thermonuclear fusion could be quickly operational but as long as the crude oil price will remain cheap, it will not be profitable to develop the huge investments required by new technologies. Once again, people are mistaken by the raw material marxist religion. Read more

It means that we can stop our oil imports from the Middle east. In the short run, we could rely on African, Caspian and Russian oil. Of course scarcity will rise the prices but on the other hand it would be an opportunity to developing new technologies. It would be also an opportunity to realize huge investments and to end definitely with unemployment and low growth. The truth is that we do not need the Middle East at all. We have just to modify our habits and to develop new investments.

Consequently, we can stop all business relations with the Middle East. As the region is just good to export oil drilled by western companies and to import all its basic stuff, this situation should be a real shock: No food, no equipment's. Of course, no more visa to travel in western countries. No more shopping on the Champs Elysées: Only the desert and a fast return to the nomadic life.

42-Expulsion of Islamists

Of course, some people may argue that such a separation could boost the terrorism. They forget that our vulnerability to terrorism is only due to the presence of a fifth islamist column on our ground. The good question is: How long shall we tolerate these islamist groups which are plotting terrific strikes against our civilians, like recently in Spain? It means that we could be obliged to expel the Islamists of Europe.

This alternative should be engraved in the mind of every ruler, student, intellectual in the Middle East. It could be a very useful pedagogical tool in schools and universities. It could be a good occasion to really think and to cease to live in phantasms.

Hot comments!

Do you agree? Do you not agree? Send your comments.

Click Here

This WAR is for REAL!
by Major General (Dr.) Vernon Chong, USAF-Retired

To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it. Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).

The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means. First, let's examine a few basics:

1. When did the threat to us start?
Many will say September 11, 2001. The answer as far as the United States is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:

* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
* Beirut, Lebanon Embassy 1983;
* Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
* Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;
* First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
* Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
* Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998;
* Dares Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
* Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000;
* New York World Trade Center 2001;
* Pentagon 2001.
(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).

2. Why were we attacked?
Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2. We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessors, Presidents Ford or Carter.

3. Who were the attackers?
In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.

4. What is the Muslim population of the World? 25%.

5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that made no difference. You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated. There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).

Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of anything other than the Jewish atrocities. Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian or any others.

Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US, but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, French or anyone else. The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?

6. So who are we at war with?
There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists. Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.

So with that background, now to the two major questions:

1. Can we lose this war?
2. What does losing really mean?

If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions.

We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?

It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business, like post Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get. What losing really means is: We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase. Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet. If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 years. The plan was clearly, for terrorist to attack us, until we were neutered and submissive to them.
We would of course have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see, we are impotent and cannot help them.

They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for them. They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will be done. Spain is finished.

The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us. However, it may already be too late for France. France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast!

If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life will all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us, if they were threatened by the Muslims.

If we can't stop the Muslims, how could anyone else?

The Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better know it too and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.

Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.

So, how can we lose the war?

Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding." That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win!

Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation.

President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation. Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling. Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have become accustomed to. We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.

And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory and in fact added many more since then.

Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?

No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them out of your head.

Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose. I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means. Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.

Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying. We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.. These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.

And just a few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason. They are also the same type enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq.

And still more recently, the same type enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held.

Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.

Can this be for real?

The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.

To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world. Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife. Again I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude, of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many years.

Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels! That translates into ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States, but throughout the world.

We are the last bastion of defense.

We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' That charge is valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world!

We can't!

If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive, and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.

And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.

This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self-inflicted fall of the Roman Empire. If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.

If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little by little, on the established French traditions. The French will be fighting among themselves, over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?

Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece by politically correct piece.

And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.

They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who will be the few who control the masses. Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?

I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above. If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. I hope now after the election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it.

After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world.

Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world!

Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it. Our "leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too.

There are those that find fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through this, that we must UNITE!

1-ISLAMISM 2-THE BATTLEFIELD 3-MORAL REARMAMENT 4-ALTERNATIVE

Best links-Click below

www.hudson.org : Go to a fascinating survey by Laurent Murawiec..

www.washingtoninstitute.org : One of the best Think tank about the Middle East.

www.fbi.gov

www.nato.int

www.defenselink.mil/

www.janes.com

www.frontpagemag.com

www.liberationiraq.org

www.newsmax.com

www.corpwatch.org

www.townhall.com

www.defenddemocracy.org

Home page Legal advices Privacy policy Search engines Contact